TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION REPORT #2
ASSIGNMENT: Describe in writing with an included illustration a simple mechanism or object of some sort that you use (or will use) in your job, career or daily life. This report should include at least five paragraphs. For some topic ideas for an object to describe, see pages 36 (#8) or 499 (#18) in your text although some of these are way too complicated for this short report. Your visual should show all main components with labeling for each part.
PLANNING/PREWRITING:
1. The item to be described in the report:
2. The audience for the paper:
3. The formal definition of the item (class + differentiating characteristics):
4. The two or three main sections of the item:
5. The components or functional parts of each section:
6. The features/comparisons to include in the overall description:
7. The order in which the components or functional parts will be discussed:
8. The features to include in discussion of each component or functional part:
9. The type of illustration (hand drawn, photo, clip art, Xerox copy, etc.):
PRIMARY WRITING TRAITS: Definition/Description/Explanation
DON'TS:
Report Writing Graphics Links
Microsoft Word '97/'98 handout including how to use Drawing Tools in older versions of Word
This is a 20-page PDF file (tutorial from University of Arizona)
http://www.library.arizona.edu/ic/infocommons-guides.html#msoffice
Simple one-page html document for newer versions of Word:
http://www.bcoe.org/admin/training/techtips/nov_04.htm
Online Technical Writing Handbook
http://www.io.com/~hcexres/textbook/
________________________________________
TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION REPORT #2
(Please attach this sheet to your final report.)
EVALUATION:
___________________________________________________________
Scoring Rubric for
Composition 103 (Report Writing) Papers
6= 100 points 4= 60 points 2= 20 points
5= 80 points 3= 40 points 1= 0 points
6—Superior
¥Clear subject and thesis (definition)
¥Focused, unified, and coherent report organization
¥Excellent document formatting
¥Fully developed and detailed descriptions that demonstrate full understanding of the assignment
¥Shows an obvious awareness of audience
¥Evidences superior control of diction, sentence variety, and transitions
¥Acceptable college-level grammar, mechanics and usage with only a few minor flaws
5—Strong
¥Clearly addresses the subject and thesis (definition)
¥Is effectively organized
¥Competent document formatting
¥Is well-developed, with supporting descriptive details that most of the time demonstrate critical thinking
¥Awareness of audience
¥Demonstrates control of diction, sentence variety, and transition
¥Acceptable college-level grammar, mechanics and usage with only a few flaws
4—Competent
¥Adequately addresses the subject but may not always make his/her main point clear
¥Is organized, but some parts may not seem well connected
¥Sketchy document formatting
¥Is adequately developed, with some detail, but support may not always be strong and clear or demonstrate sound reasoning
¥Some awareness of audience
¥Demonstrates competent writing, but some sentences may lack variety and diction may be imprecise in areas
¥May have some flaws in grammar, mechanics and usage
3—Weak
¥May distort or neglect important elements/issues dealing with the subject; may be too simplistic or stereotypical in thought
¥May demonstrate problems in organization
¥Defective document format
¥May have generalizations without supporting detail or detail without generalizations; may be undeveloped; may show a lack of thought
¥Lack of audience awareness
¥May show patterns of flaws in language and syntax; confused words
¥Grammar, mechanics and usage may not conform to conventions of standard English, distracting the reader from the content
2—Inadequate
¥Thesis and subject are very fuzzy; paper seems unfocused, vague and unreasoned
¥Will demonstrate serious inadequacy in one or more of the areas specified for the 3 paper
¥Simple words are frequently misspelled
1—Incompetent
¥Failed attempts to fulfill the requirements of the assignment
¥Deliberately off-topic papers
¥Paper so incompletely developed as to suggest or demonstrate incompetence.
¥Paper wholly incompetent mechanically